With the government shutdown going into effect today, not
only is it a reminder of how the American political system endlessly fails to accomplish
anything. But looking at this shutdown though a revolution lens, I start to
question what exactly it takes to start a revolution.
Clearly shutting down the government is a cry for change,
but where is the line draw between change and revolution? The line is already
blurred when lumping the Renaissance and the French Revolution into the same "revolutionary" category. Both of these changes effected mass amounts of people with new radical ideas. Revolutions
start with a need/want for change, and a new radical idea comes to fill that need.
Shutting down all the National Parks, Museums, NASA, Environmental
Protection Agencies, along with sending over 1 million employees home, certainly
seems radial, but without a new idea and an instigator, no revolutionary change would
ever come to our government.
Maybe it’s time for a revolution in our own American government,
to change the way our countries views this mess of politics. So what would it
take to start a revolution in our government? First we would need a revolutionary idea
whether that be a new party system, a total revamp of the congress, or just
copying the European Union? Then we would also need a new instigator. A new political
party? A president? Or a senator?
So maybe next time when the government shuts down for the 19th time in history, a new idea
and an instigator will arise. Then under those conditions a government shutdown
could be a spark for a political revolution in America.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/10/03/US-Capitol-in-lockdown
ReplyDeleteI think you are definitely on to something Kate. This just happened a little earlier today and you can feel the unrest and anger among citizens. The Dow also has begun to slip which might hint at the one element left that could further spark a revolution: some sort of economic collapse.